Product Code Database
Example Keywords: super mario -radiant $10
   » » Wiki: Fuel Efficiency
Tag Wiki 'Fuel Efficiency'.
Tag

Fuel efficiency (or fuel economy) is a form of thermal efficiency, meaning the of effort to result of a process that converts contained in a carrier () into kinetic energy or . Overall fuel efficiency may vary per device, which in turn may vary per application, and this spectrum of variance is often illustrated as a continuous . Non-transportation applications, such as industry, benefit from increased fuel efficiency, especially fossil fuel power plants or industries dealing with , such as production during the .

In the context of , fuel economy is the energy efficiency of a particular vehicle, given as a of distance traveled per unit of consumed. It is dependent on several factors including engine efficiency, transmission design, and design. In most countries, using the , fuel economy is stated as "fuel consumption" in per 100 (L/100 km) or kilometers per liter (km/L or kmpl). In a number of countries still using other systems, fuel economy is expressed in per (mpg), for example in the US and usually also in the UK ( gallon); there is sometimes confusion as the imperial gallon is 20% larger than the US gallon so that mpg values are not directly comparable. Traditionally, litres per mil were used in and , but both have aligned to the EU standard of L/100 km.

Fuel consumption is a more accurate measure of a vehicle's performance because it is a linear relationship while fuel economy leads to distortions in efficiency improvements. Weight-specific efficiency (efficiency per unit weight) may be stated for , and passenger-specific efficiency (vehicle efficiency per passenger) for passenger vehicles.


Vehicle design
Fuel efficiency is dependent on many parameters of a vehicle, including its parameters, aerodynamic drag, weight, AC usage, fuel and rolling resistance. There have been advances in all areas of vehicle design in recent decades. Fuel efficiency of vehicles can also be improved by careful maintenance and driving habits.

use two or more power sources for propulsion. In many designs, a small combustion engine is combined with electric motors. Kinetic energy which would otherwise be lost to heat during braking is recaptured as electrical power to improve fuel efficiency. The larger batteries in these vehicles power the car's electronics, allowing the engine to shut off and avoid prolonged idling.


Fleet efficiency
Fleet efficiency describes the average efficiency of a population of vehicles. Technological advances in efficiency may be offset by a change in buying habits with a propensity to heavier vehicles that are less fuel-efficient.


Energy efficiency terminology
Energy efficiency is similar to fuel efficiency but the input is usually in units of energy such as (MJ), (kW·h), kilocalories (kcal) or British thermal units (BTU). The inverse of "energy efficiency" is "", or the amount of input energy required for a unit of output such as MJ/passenger-km (of passenger transport), BTU/ton-mile or kJ/t-km (of freight transport), GJ/t (for production of steel and other materials), BTU/(kW·h) (for electricity generation), or litres/100 km (of vehicle travel). Litres per 100 km is also a measure of "energy intensity" where the input is measured by the amount of fuel and the output is measured by the travelled. For example: Fuel economy in automobiles.

Given a heat value of a fuel, it would be trivial to convert from fuel units (such as litres of gasoline) to energy units (such as MJ) and conversely. But there are two problems with comparisons made using energy units:

  • There are two different heat values for any hydrogen-containing fuel which can differ by several percent (see below).
  • When comparing transportation energy costs, a of electric energy may require an amount of fuel with heating value of 2 or 3 kilowatt hours to produce it.


Energy content of fuel
The specific of a fuel is the heat energy obtained when a certain quantity is burned (such as a gallon, litre, kilogram). It is sometimes called the heat of combustion. There exists two different values of energy for the same batch of fuel. One is the high (or gross) heat of combustion and the other is the low (or net) heat of combustion. The high value is obtained when, after the combustion, the water in the exhaust is in liquid form. For the low value, the exhaust has all the water in vapor form (steam). Since water vapor gives up heat energy when it changes from vapor to liquid, the liquid water value is larger since it includes the of vaporization of water. The difference between the high and low values is significant, about 8 or 9%. This accounts for most of the apparent discrepancy in the heat value of gasoline. In the U.S. (and the table) the high heat values have traditionally been used, but in many other countries, the low heat values are commonly used.

Regular /petrol34.8 150,100125,000Min. 91
Premium /petrol Min. 95
(LPG) (60% and 40% )25.5–28.7 108–110
23.531.1Calculated from heats of formation. Does not correspond exactly to the figure for MJ/L divided by density.101,60084,600129
17.919.977,60064,600123
(10% ethanol and 90% gasoline)33.7 145,200121,00093/94
E85 (85% ethanol and 15% gasoline)25.2 108,87890,660100–105
38.6 166,600138,700
35.139.9151,600126,200
(using 9.00 kcal/g)34.337.7147,894123,143
Aviation gasoline33.546.8144,400120,20080-145
, naphtha35.546.6153,100127,500N/A to turbine engines
, kerosene37.6 162,100135,000N/A to turbine engines
Liquefied natural gas25.3 109,00090,800
9.3 40,46733,696
Appendix B, Transportation Energy Data Book from the Center for Transportation Analysis of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Neither the gross heat of combustion nor the net heat of combustion gives the theoretical amount of mechanical energy (work) that can be obtained from the reaction. (This is given by the change in Gibbs free energy, and is around 45.7 MJ/kg for gasoline.) The actual amount of mechanical work obtained from fuel (the inverse of the specific fuel consumption) depends on the engine. A figure of 17.6 MJ/kg is possible with a gasoline engine, and 19.1 MJ/kg for a diesel engine. See Brake-specific fuel consumption for more information.


Transportation

Fuel efficiency of motor vehicles

Driving technique

Advanced technology
The most efficient machines for converting energy to rotary motion are electric motors, as used in electric vehicles. However, electricity is not a primary energy source so the efficiency of the electricity production has also to be taken into account. trains can be powered using electricity, delivered through an additional running rail, overhead system or by on-board generators used in diesel-electric locomotives as common on the US and UK rail networks. Pollution produced from centralised generation of electricity is emitted at a distant power station, rather than "on site". Pollution can be reduced by using more railway electrification and low carbon power for electricity. Some railways, such as the French SNCF and Swiss federal railways derive most, if not 100% of their power, from hydroelectric or nuclear power stations, therefore atmospheric pollution from their rail networks is very low. This was reflected in a study by AEA Technology between a train and airline journeys between London and Paris, which showed the trains on average emitting 10 times less CO2, per passenger, than planes, helped in part by French nuclear generation.


Hydrogen fuel cells
In the future, may be commercially available. Toyota is test-marketing vehicles powered by hydrogen fuel cells in southern California, where a series of hydrogen fueling stations has been established. Powered either through chemical reactions in a that create electricity to drive very efficient electrical motors or by directly burning hydrogen in a combustion engine (near identically to a natural gas vehicle, and similarly compatible with both natural gas and gasoline); these vehicles promise to have near-zero pollution from the tailpipe (exhaust pipe). Potentially the atmospheric pollution could be minimal, provided the hydrogen is made by using electricity from non-polluting sources such as solar, wind or or nuclear. Commercial hydrogen production uses fossil fuels and produces more carbon dioxide than hydrogen.

Because there are pollutants involved in the manufacture and destruction of a car and the production, transmission and storage of electricity and hydrogen, the label "zero pollution" applies only to the car's conversion of stored energy into movement.

In 2004, a consortium of major auto-makers — , , , and / — came up with "Top Tier Detergent Gasoline Standard" to brands in the US and Canada that meet their minimum standards for content Top Tier Gasoline and do not contain metallic additives. Top Tier gasoline contains higher levels of detergent additives in order to prevent the build-up of deposits (typically, on and ) known to reduce fuel economy and engine performance.


In microgravity
How fuel combusts affects how much energy is produced. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has investigated fuel consumption in .

The common distribution of a flame under normal gravity conditions depends on , because soot tends to rise to the top of a flame, such as in a candle, making the flame yellow. In microgravity or , such as an environment in , convection no longer occurs, and the flame becomes , with a tendency to become more blue and more efficient. There are several possible explanations for this difference, of which the most likely one given is the hypothesis that the temperature is evenly distributed enough that soot is not formed and complete combustion occurs., National Aeronautics and Space Administration, April 2005. Experiments by NASA in microgravity reveal that in microgravity allow more soot to be completely oxidised after they are produced than diffusion flames on Earth, because of a series of mechanisms that behaved differently in microgravity when compared to normal gravity conditions. LSP-1 experiment results, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, April 2005. in microgravity burn at a much slower rate and more efficiently than even a candle on Earth, and last much longer. SOFBAL-2 experiment results , National Aeronautics and Space Administration, April 2005.


See also

External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time